RONDELI BLOG
Trade of Electricity: Successes of 2016, Reality of 2017 and Future Prospects – the Impact of Bitcoin (Part One)
Author: Amb. Valeri Chechelashvili, Senior-Fellow at Rondeli Foundation
Negative external trade balance is a significant macro-economic challenge facing our country. Mostly, this is due to the formation of the liberal economic model coupled with the fact that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, for a multitude of political and economic reasons, the economy of Georgia collapsed as well. These reasons can be a topic of a separate study. Here, we shall address a very important issue – the accelerated growth of exports.
For the first time in the history of independent Georgia, in 2017 exports, excluding re-export, exceeded USD 2 billion and amounted to USD 2,063 million. Together with re-export it came close to the record data of 2013, amounting to USD 2,727 million, falling just USD 183 million short of 2013 indicator.
Exports in 2017 increased by 29% as compared to 2016, whilst imports increased by 9%. This is a serious step forward. The growth of exports and imports in absolute numbers were also almost equal (exports – USD 614 million, imports – USD 685 million). There was a better situation only in 2013, when exports increased by USD 534 million whilst imports reduced by USD 34 million (Source: http://www.geostat.ge).
One could list a number of directions for both export growth as well as import substitution. The subject of this paper is one of such promising directions – trade of electricity. The sector of electric energy possesses impressive export development potential. It is widely acclaimed that one of the priorities for Georgia is to develop energy and particularly a specific sector of it – hydroelectric energy. It is interesting that in 2010, export of electricity amounted to USD 36.5 million, becoming one of the largest export positions, together with ferroalloys (USD 264 million), cars (USD 227 million), copper ore (USD 75 million) and natural wine (USD 41 million) (Source: http://www.geostat.ge/?action=page&p_id=133&lang=geo). In the same year, net exports amounted to USD 23.5 million.
Georgia’s Trade of Electricity (USD Million).
|
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Exports |
36.5 |
32.6 |
18.6 |
14.0 |
29.5 |
26.0 |
22.3 |
18.2 |
Imports |
13.0 |
24.4 |
32.5 |
30.3 |
51.0 |
43.8 |
21.8 |
66.7 |
Balance |
23.5 |
8.2 |
-13.9 |
-16.3 |
-21.5 |
-17.8 |
0.5 |
-48.5 |
Source: http://www.geostat.ge/?action=page&p_id=133&lang=geo
Unfortunately, the trend could not be maintained. Moreover, the success of 2016 (after 2011, our country once again became a net exporter of electricity) was cancelled out in 2017, when an unprecedented amount of money was spent on electricity imports – USD 66.7 million with net imports amounting to USD 48.5 million. The table below will attempt to explain this phenomenon.
Comparisons of the Growth of GDP of Georgia with the Consumption of Electricity, in Percent
|
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
GDP Real Growth (%) |
6.4 |
7.2 |
6.4 |
3.4 |
4.6 |
2.9 |
2.8 |
4.8* |
Electricity Consumption Growth (%) |
10.4 |
9.6 |
1.3 |
3.3 |
4.9 |
2.0 |
6.2 |
N/A** |
*Preliminary.
**Not available at the moment.
Sources: http://gnerc.org/files/wliuri%20angariSi/ANNUAL%20REPORT%202016_opt.pdf
http://www.geostat.ge/?action=page&p_id=118&lang=geo
The two indicators presented in the table move more-or-less in sync after the saturation of the individual consumption market in 2013-2015, which is entirely logical. In 2016, the growth of the consumption of electricity (6.2%) far exceeded the real GDP growth (2.8%), whilst the additional demand was covered through increased production of electricity (7.2%). As a result, after a four-year pause, Georgia once again assumed the status of a net electricity exporting country.
As already pointed out above, such a state could not be maintained in 2017. Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission has not yet published the 2017 Report; however, we can assume with high likelihood that the growth of the consumption of electricity has significantly exceeded its production, which caused the necessity of a record amount of electricity imports in the independence period, with the value reaching about USD 66.7 million.
Presumably, the growth of the consumption of electricity exceeded 10% in 2017, as opposed to 6.2% growth in 2016. Since this was not corresponded with equivalent GDP growth, there has to be another explanation for this occurrence, for example, the growth of the volume of electricity used for Bitcoin mining.
This problem has already appeared in Iceland. The growing demand on electricity resulting from Bitcoin mining already created problems within the energy system. Local energy experts started talking about the danger of energy crisis. Already today, the amount of electricity spent on mining Bitcoin in Iceland is twice as much as the volume of individual consumption (See: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43030677).
Currently, Iceland has a lively debate about putting Bitcoin mining within comprehensive legal framework. Icelandic MP, Smari McCarthy (https://twitter.com/smarimc), is actively working on this issue. He argues that those who mine Bitcoin should themselves be interested in having coherent and transparent rules of play, so as to avoid any misunderstandings that might arise in the future. It is difficult to disagree with this opinion.
China is also seriously discussing the issue. For example, People’s Bank of China plans to impose certain restrictions on the companies occupied with mining Bitcoin. These measures include abolishing the preferential regime for these companies in the fields of electricity supply, land usage and taxes (See: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-03/china-is-said-to-curb-electricity-supply-for-some-bitcoin-miners;https://www.caixinglobal.com/2018-01-04/china-clamps-down-on-preferential-treatment-for-bitcoin-mines-101193622.html).
How do these trends reveal themselves in Georgia’s reality and what solutions can be found, taking the interests of both businesses as well as the state into account? We shall attempt to answer these questions in the second part of our blog.
Related posts
- Hungary’s illiberal influence on Georgia’s European integration: a worrying pattern
- Expected Political Consequences of the Restoration of Railway Communication Between Russia and Georgia through Occupied Abkhazia
- The Turkish Economy following on from the Elections
- The 11th package of EU sanctions and Georgia
- Occupied Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali Region: Trade “Legalization” and Prospects of the Russian Transit Corridor
- Russia’s New Foreign Policy Concept and the Occupied Regions of Georgia
- Power of the people in Georgia: The EU must remain vigilant
- Flight Resumption with Russia - Potential Consequences for Georgia
- On the "Agent of Foreign Influence'' Bill and Its Disastrous Consequences for Georgia
- How the Sino-American Competition Looks from Tbilisi
- What does Russia want from Georgia?
- Geopolitics, Turkish Style, and How to React to It
- The Danger Russia’s Neighbors May Face after the Russo-Ukrainian War
- The Biden Doctrine and its Implications for Georgia
- In line for the candidate status, Georgia will get a European perspective. What are we worried about?
- The War and Georgia
- Ukraine will soon embark on a path of practical integration into the European Union. What about Georgia?
- NATO’s possible expansion in Northern Europe and its significance for Georgia and Ukraine
- Abkhazia in 2021: Energy Crisis, New “Minister” and Political Controversy
- What are the Prospects of the Eastern Partnership Summit Set on 15 December?
- What Lies Behind the Growing Cooperation of the Georgian and Hungarian Governments
- Vaccination: “To Be, or not to Be”…
- Can Georgia use China to balance Russia?
- Belarus’ exit from the Eastern Partnership and what to expect next
- Pacta Sunt Servanda: Agreements must be kept
- Associated Trio, What is Next?
- What Should Georgia Expect from the NATO Summit
- The Issue of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali Region in the Context of NATO and European Union Membership
- USA, Liberal International Order, Challenges of 2021, and Georgia
- Georgia's transit opportunities, novelties and challenges against the backdrop of the pandemic
- Georgia’s Application for European Union Membership
- A New Dawn for Transatlantic Relations under Biden’s Presidency: What Are the Hopes for Georgia?
- COVID 19 Pandemic Economic Crisis and Reducing the Instability of Georgia’s National Currency
- Escalation of the Karabakh Conflict: Threats and Challenges for Georgia
- Georgia’s European Way During the Period of Pandemic Deglobalization
- The Pragmatism and Idealism of the Georgian-American Partnership
- Independence of Georgia and the Historic Responsibility of Our Generation
- Complications Caused by the Coronavirus in Turkey and Their Influence on Georgia
- “Elections” in Abkhazia: New “President’s” Revanche and Challenges
- Consumer Crisis in the Tskhinvali Region: Food for Thought
- Georgians Fighting the Same Battle 99 Years Later
- Georgian Defense – Political Paradox and the Vicious Circle of Not Having a System
- Why It Matters: Georgia’s 'Troll Scandal' Explained
- What Will the New Dialogue Format with Russia Bring for Georgia?
- On the “Russian Culture Center” in Georgia
- Whither Economic Policy?
- Massive Cyberattacks On Georgia Calls For Defense And Resilience
- What do we know about the meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the Russian Federation and Georgia?
- What is the Connection between NATO and Reclaiming Abkhazia?
- Georgia's Problems are not Addressed at G7 Meetings: Who is to Blame?
- Vladimir Putin’s Main Messages in his Interview with the Financial Times
- Dugin has Come Out as a Supporter of Georgia – How Did This Happen?
- The Outcome of the European Parliament Elections - What Does it Mean for Georgia?
- Deterring Russia
- Why Local Elections of March 31, 2019 in Turkey are Important?
- Does the Principle of Strategic Partnership Work in Ukraine-Georgia Relations?
- A New Chance for Circular Labor Migration between Georgia and the EU
- Georgia’s Trade with Electricity: The Influence of Bitcoin
- Georgia’s External Trade: How to Strengthen Positive Trends
- The Risk of the Renewal of the Karabakh Conflict after the Velvet Revolution in Armenia
- Depreciation of the Georgian National Currency: Economic, Psychological, Administrative and Political Factors
- Why It Is Necessary to Know the Day the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 Started
- Georgia’s Position in the Westernization Index 2018
- Why Did the Results of the G7 Summit in Charlevoix not Meet Our Expectations?
- The Ben Hodges Model – a Real Way for Georgia’s Membership in NATO
- Why did the Foreign Ministers of G7 not remember Georgia during their 23 April 2018 Toronto Meeting?
- Georgia and the American Strategy
- Putin’s Pre-Election Economic Promises: Myth and Reality
- Trade of Electricity: Successes of 2016, Reality of 2017 and Future Prospects– the Impact of Bitcoin (Part Two)
- Let Geneva Stay the Way it is
- Geopolitical Vision of the Russian Opposition
- Dangers Originating from Russia and Georgia’s Security System
- Eurasian Custom Union and problems of Russian – Georgian FTA
- Is Georgia’s Export Growth Sustainable?
- What Awaits the People of Gali?
- Disrupt and Distract: Russia’s Methodology of Dealing with the West
- Trojan Horse Model IL- 76 or Why Would Russia Want to Fight Georgia’s Forest Fires
- Russian Diplomats in Georgia – who are they, how many of them are there and what are they up to
- Is it Acceptable for Georgia to Declare Neutrality?
- Georgia’s European Perspective in the Context of EU’s Future Evolution
- Brexit Negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom have been re-launched: What will be their Influence on Georgia?
- Kremlin’s Policy in the Occupied Regions of Georgia Moves to a New Stage
- Turkey’s Domestic and Foreign Policy in the Context of Regional Security
- Post-Soviet States – Struggle for the Legitimation of Power
- Current Foreign Policy of Georgia: How Effective is it in Dealing with the Existing Challenges?
- Military Resilience - a Needed Factor for NATO-Partners
- Observations on the Agreement Reached with Gazprom
- New Russian Weaponry in the Caucasus and Its Impact on Georgia’s NATO Aspiration